Hi,
最近寫了最重要的催眠暗示一文後，覺得多寫一篇最重要的 Coaching 問題也會十分好玩的。
Coaching 一般是以問題來促進對方思維，那問什麼問題是最重要的呢？
小弟認為，絕不是什麼聰明的問題，而是最基本、最直接的問題－還有呢？ (廣東話：仲有呢？)
如果 Coaching 的目的，真的是要讓對方拓闊思路、增加選擇的話，又有什麼問題比『仲有呢？』更重要呢？
『仲有呢？』意義在於你正在期待更多的答案！這種期待，令對方產生壓力，在壓力下，只要不是太大，平時想不出的，也能想出！
如何問才能製造壓力，但又不會太大呢？給予對方時間空間！
不管你是否在教練對方，只要你是在問問題，目的是為了解難也好，創新也好，測試對方知識也好，問『仲有呢？』肯定能為你及對方帶來更多意念，今時今日，你不會還相信『一個問題，一個答案』吧！
最重要的 Coaching 問題，除了『仲有呢？』外，仲有呢？
Keith
Explore, Exceed & Excel
Keith To's Ideas & Thoughts on NLP, Hypnosis, Coaching, Facilitation, Personal and Business Development. These seem to be nothing related. But from a Systemic Thinking perspective, they share similar nature and processes. 陶兆輝對身心語言程序學、催眠治療學、教練學、輔引學、個人發展及商業發展的純個人看法；它們看似毫不相關，但當你從合整式思維角度來看，它們卻擁有相近的性質及過程；我將每隔數天不斷加入新的文章, 內容絕不敢認為是肯定正確, 旨在拋磚引玉而矣。 (All articles copyrighted by Keith To)
Showing posts with label Problemology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Problemology. Show all posts
2008/08/07
Concepts 101 Part 31: 解難
Hi,
前文談到『難』，如何能解？
解難之道，除了解開以外，還有解拆、解體、越過、繞過、搬移、鑽地、掘地、另覓他途、最後還可另尋目標，此乃解難十法也。
Keith
Explore, Exceed & Excel
前文談到『難』，如何能解？
解難之道，除了解開以外，還有解拆、解體、越過、繞過、搬移、鑽地、掘地、另覓他途、最後還可另尋目標，此乃解難十法也。
Keith
Explore, Exceed & Excel
Concepts 101 Part 30: 難與不能
Hi,
難 (Difficult)，代表有障礙；不能 (Impossible)，代表障礙是無法解決！
難的，不等於不能！
能不能，視乎你有沒有方法。(這是 NLP 其中一項最重要的前題假設)
太多人把它們混亂了以後，凡是難的，便認為是不能，放棄好了！
Keith
Explore, Exceed & Excel
難 (Difficult)，代表有障礙；不能 (Impossible)，代表障礙是無法解決！
難的，不等於不能！
能不能，視乎你有沒有方法。(這是 NLP 其中一項最重要的前題假設)
太多人把它們混亂了以後，凡是難的，便認為是不能，放棄好了！
Keith
Explore, Exceed & Excel
2006/05/03
Problemology: Problem Solving Models
Hi,
I recieved an question from one of our classmates today as follows:
You have suggested two different approaches to solve difficult problem in the WABC Roundtable meetings:
1) 忘記 - 憂慮 - 欠缺 - 挫折 - 忽略 - 危險
2) 症狀 - 理想 - 差異 - 機制 - 解決 - 起因
Do you have any suggestion on how to relate the 2 approaches into an inter-related model for solving problem. Any suggestion will be greatly appreciated.
Here is my answer and I like to share with you all:
These 2 models are choices for you to choose to solve your problems.
They might not have any relationship. But the more choices one has, the higher the possibility of getting his/her problems solved. One can't solve his/her problems because one might not have enough choicea or have only one single choice but it doesn't works.
In my recent free course, the Life Strategist Program, I presented 50 problem solving strategies. The one message I want to share is: We can have a lots of choices!
BTW, the first model can be easily used in personal problems while the 2nd one can be used in both personal and business situations with ease.
Keith
Explore, Exceed & Excel
I recieved an question from one of our classmates today as follows:
You have suggested two different approaches to solve difficult problem in the WABC Roundtable meetings:
1) 忘記 - 憂慮 - 欠缺 - 挫折 - 忽略 - 危險
2) 症狀 - 理想 - 差異 - 機制 - 解決 - 起因
Do you have any suggestion on how to relate the 2 approaches into an inter-related model for solving problem. Any suggestion will be greatly appreciated.
Here is my answer and I like to share with you all:
These 2 models are choices for you to choose to solve your problems.
They might not have any relationship. But the more choices one has, the higher the possibility of getting his/her problems solved. One can't solve his/her problems because one might not have enough choicea or have only one single choice but it doesn't works.
In my recent free course, the Life Strategist Program, I presented 50 problem solving strategies. The one message I want to share is: We can have a lots of choices!
BTW, the first model can be easily used in personal problems while the 2nd one can be used in both personal and business situations with ease.
Keith
Explore, Exceed & Excel
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)